文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：论我国行政诉讼构造:“主观诉讼”抑或“客观诉讼”?

英文题名：On China's Administrative Litigation Structure:‘Subjective Litigation' or ‘Objective Litigation'?

作者：薛刚凌[1];杨欣[2]

机构：[1]中国政法大学法学院;[2]中国劳动关系学院法学系

年份：2013

期号：4

起止页码：29

中文期刊名：行政法学研究

外文期刊名：Administrative Law Review

收录：CSSCI2012_2013、、BDHX2011、NSSD、BDHX、CSSCI

语种：中文

中文关键词：主观诉讼;客观诉讼;主观请求;客观审判

外文关键词：Subjective Litigation; Objective Litigation; Subjective Request; Objective Adjudication

中文摘要：主观诉讼或客观诉讼的定位决定了一国行政诉讼的基本构造,要素考察发现,我国行政诉讼在结构上呈现出"内错裂"状态,这种"内错裂"使得我国行政诉讼既不是完整意义上的主观诉讼,也不是完整意义上的客观诉讼。诉讼构造上的这种扭曲导致我国行政诉讼既不能有效回地应相对人的诉讼请求,也不能充分地保障客观公法秩序。修改《行政诉讼法》,应从理顺行政诉讼构造入手,依据主观诉讼与客观诉讼的不同特质,构建与之相匹配的诉讼规则。

外文摘要：The orientation of subjective litigation or objective litigation decides the basic structure of a country＇s administrative litigation. According to the element examination, it is found that the structure of China＇s administrative litigation has taken on the state of ＇inner cracking＇, which makes the administrative litigation of China neither subjective nor objective on the whole sense. The distortion leads to the fact that China＇ s administrative litigation can neither effectively respond to the litigation application of the counterparts, nor fully guarantee the objective order of the public law. The amendment of the Administrative Procedure Law should start from straightening out the administrative litigation structure and be based on different traits of subjective and objective litigation to construct litigation rules matching with it.